Several of the philosophers we have already discussed considered it the pinnacle of their careers to come and teach in this great city.
As I made my way through his material on Plato and Aristotle in particular, I could not help wondering if Greek philosophers only restated, in a distorted form, what Moses taught nearly a thousand years before.
Dualism says there are two competing places for ultimate truth and reality, the material world, and the mind soul, spirit. Plato wanted to emphasis the mind soul, spiritthe non-material world, because he believed that the mind soul, spirit is more than just our brain.
The mind spirit, soul has a non-material, spiritual dimension that includes consciousness, sensations, thoughts, emotions, desires, beliefs, and choices. Matter, or materialism, cannot create, or produce these things.
If anyone needs proof, try talking to a corpse, a rock, or a piece of clay. Materialism actually competes with the mind for ultimate truth, or reality, for materialism holds that everything in the universe is made from physical materials, including the human mind soul, spiritor brain.
Spiritual attributes do not exist in the universe. Therefore, our mind soul, spiritand brain, are one and the same. When the body dies, the mind soul, spirit dies. Life ceases to exist.
If anyone needs proof, try talking to a corpse, or a dead animal, no matter how much each is loved. For the Christian, the question arises as to whether or not the Bible supports Dualism.
Does the Bible recognize a distinction between materialism, the body, with its brain, and the mind spirit, soul? Indeed the Bible does. We know that Adam named the animals, and he named Eve when she was created.
Adam named every living creature. On this point, Plato departs from Moses. According to Moses, God looked at all of His creation, and declared it to be very good.
The Judeo-Christian view of the world returns to the Biblical view as recorded by Moses. As Judaism might have influenced Plato, so the Scriptures might have guided Aristotle.
Aristotle — BC critiqued the thoughts of Plato, and faulted him for neglecting the natural world. Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good? The Unmoved Mover could be regarded as a Watchmaker who made the components of the watch, wound it up, and left it to run according to natural laws.
The Unmoved Mover was not acted upon, but is the cause of created life. Long before Aristotle postulated his Unmoved Mover not acted upon, but acting, is the God of Moses who created the heavens, and the earth, and all that is therein.
Elohim is not acted upon, but acts. The Bible teaches that God can suspend the laws of nature, and, has. There was the day the sun stood still.
There was the day Jesus overcame death.
There was the day Jesus ascended into heaven. Plato was wrong to point to heaven, and say that ultimate reality is outside of this world. Aristotle was correct to insist that reality is lodged in specific items. But both were wrong not to bow before the Lord God Jehovah, who, in the beginning, created.Plato and Aristotle on Form and Matter Plato: Form and Matter Plato's idea of form is also called 'eidos' the ideal, idea, or inherent substance of the matter.
To Plato, the ideal was the immanescent substance in . Cicero adopted the sequence in his treatise on ethics, De finibus: Epicurus, Stoa, Ancient Academy/Aristotle, and finally Plato in the Tusculans, strongly linked to the De finibus by Cicero himself. The main difference is the presence of Moses in a scholastic text.
Plato, Aristotle, and Moses Essay Words | 10 Pages. and nations have enjoyed great happiness when a single individual has taken heed of the Good and Beautiful. Aristotle vs Plato comparison.
Aristotle and Plato were philosophers in ancient Greece who critically studied matters of ethics, science, politics, and more. Though many more of Plato's works survived the centuries, Aristotle's contributions have arguably been more influential, particul.
Like his teacher Plato, Aristotle's philosophy aims at the universal. Aristotle's ontology places the universal (katholou) in particulars (kath' hekaston), things in the world, whereas for Plato the universal is a separately existing form which actual things imitate.
The early apologists, both Jewish and Christian, maintained that Plato learned from Moses, that he was Moses speaking Attic Greek. The most notable of these was Eusebius of Caesarea, who, in his work The Preparation of the Gospel, argued the case in great detail and .