An argument against using animals in medical research

What is the role DNA polymerases plan in maintaining the integrity of genetic information? What are the possibilities of targeting DNA polmerases with pharmaceutical agents in cancer therapies?

An argument against using animals in medical research

Download this page in PDF format Figure 1: Questions posed as the Act took shape and came into effect proved tenacious, occasioning extensive debate and indicating differences that were not to be eased, at least for anti-vivisectionists, for decades to come. Amongst the many questions: What is the role of anesthesia in assessing pain?

Are experiments under anesthesia still cruel? What kinds of animals require or deserve protection? Should an inspection system exist? Who can be an inspector? In answering questions like these, experimental science approached vivisection as a vitally modern scientific method that generated essential scientific knowledge.

Anti-vivisectionists, however, answered such questions very differently. The Passage of the Act In Maytwo draft bills to regulate the use of living animals in scientific experiments were presented in the Houses of Parliamentone to the House of Lords and one to the Commons.

The first was presented to the House of Lords on 4 May It had been pulled together through the efforts of Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, and John Burdon Sanderson, a leading physiologist and one of the few scientists in England then regularly using living animals in his research. Licenses for painful experiments undertaken without anesthesia could also be granted by the Home Secretary on several grounds: Neither the Henniker nor the Playfair draft Bill passed into law.

Controversial, representing diverse interests, and introduced by private members late in the Parliamentary session, the stand-off created by the Bills led to the establishment of a Royal Commission, the formation of the first formal anti-vivisection societies, and in due course the establishment of the powerful medical lobbying group, the Association for the Advancement of Medicine by Research AAMR.

The historian Richard D. Certainly, the legislation that received Royal Assent on 15 August brought together many of the key provisions outlined in the Henniker and Playfair Bills. The Home Secretary oversaw all licensing of experiments on living vertebrate animals, as well as the registering and periodical inspection of all premises for experimentation.

Licenses were valid for one year and required the support of a president of one of eleven named medical or scientific bodies and a professor of medicine or medical science. Scientists could be granted licenses for experiments conducted without anaesthesia or for experiments conducted for demonstration purposes with anaesthesia under the same terms.

Experiments were to have a medically useful end. No experiments were permitted before the public or for the purpose of improving manual dexterity.

Experiments on dogs, cats, horses, mules and asses could be conducted without anaesthesia if the necessity of these animals to the success of the experiment could be shown.

Curare, a substance that immobilized animals without de-sensitizing their nerves, was not defined as an anaesthetic under the Act. Penalties imposed for improper licensing were relatively mild: All prosecutions under the Act required the written permission of the Home Secretary.

The Act, and the practices it regulated, continued to generate questions that engaged ethical, political, scientific, and legal expertise, and yielded profoundly different, often contingent, answers for the groups involved. The differences between research and demonstration, for example, were critical both for medical scientists and anti-vivisectionists.

What is the purpose of demonstration in experimental physiology?The Pro Life Argument Against Abortion - Abortion is defined as the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of .

Guide to justifications for harming and exploiting animals. 1 It doesn't harm animals to kill them 2 It doesn't harm animals to take their eggs 3 It doesn't harm animals to take their milk. Heroic men, heroic women, and animals.

An argument against using animals in medical research

See also the section The courage of the bullfighters, which includes material on the courage of the rock climbers and mountaineers, including the remarkable achievements of the free climber Alex Honnold..

This is a very varied section, like some other sections of the page. So much writing in support of bullfighting is suffocating in its exclusion of the.

Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. animal experimentation in medical research and cosmetics testing cannot be justified on the basis that animals are lower on the evolutionary chart than humans since animals resemble humans in so many ways.

Animal testing - Wikipedia

Against Animal Testing. The Animals Act of ensures that any research using animals must be fully assessed in terms of any harm to the animals. This involves detailed examination . Science topics are interesting to write and easy to research because there are so many current and reputable journals online.

Start by browsing through the topic questions below, then look at some of the linked articles or continue your search online with the links provided.

Science Topics for Research Papers | Owlcation